Monday, 24 July 2017

New Pedagogical Approaches for Effective Gurus


India has 4 crore students enrolled in higher education, more than the total population of Canada. But, many employers do not consider a large number of the graduating students employable. Every year even some of the IITs also terminate several students for poor performance. Both of these can largely be remedied by employing a proper combination of pedagogical approaches. To make the students passing out from various streams better employable by facilitating effective learning, by  combining  suitable modern approaches of adult learning (andragogy), self directed learning  (heutagogy) etc.  in addition to the conventional pedagogies which focus to facilitate child learning. Likewise, a suitable combination of appropriate transition pedagogies should be employed to better familiarise and engage the students in learning, and to avoid the ugly state of poor performance, necessitating termination of students; who get admission only after the fiercest of the admission-competition in the country. Therefore, the present paper attempts to give a brief overview of some of the modern approaches capable to optimize learning through better customized blend of teaching approaches and help the students smoothly transit in the institutes of higher learning.   
A host of new teaching-learning approaches have evolved in the preceding 2-3 decades to facilitate better learning, especially for adult learning, self directed learning and peer to peer learning, hitherto unheard and never employed before to supplement the conventional pedagogies focused at child learning (peda/pedo/paedo= child). These newer learning facilitating approaches in addition to the conventional pedagogical approaches are:

(i) andragogy,   (ii) heutagogy,     (iii) critical pedagogy,    
(iv) ecopedagogy,   (v)ubuntugogy,     (vi) creative pedagogy,   
(vii) peeragogy,   (viii) hip-hop critical pedagogy    (ix) public pedagogy
 (x) transition pedagogy 
 The conventional methods and techniques of teaching-learning like lecture method, discussions slide shows etc.  need to be complemented with a blend of newer approaches, including various newly emerging pedagogical, andragogical, heutagogical, peeragogical and similar other approaches to enhance  knowledge, skills and capabilities of graduating students in the today's hypercompetive   knowledge-driven economy. Moreover, to remedy the problem of poor employability of graduating youth, appropriate blending of pedagogical, ragogical, and heutagogical, peeragogical and other modern approaches of teaching is necessary in our colleges and universities. This paper therefore, attempts to elucidate some major approaches or gogies out of the 10 such gogies or approaches in vogue, viz the pedagogy, andragogy and heutagogy. The various approaches of teaching or gogies which can help in enhancing the efficacy of teaching and educating are: pedagogy, andragogy, heutagogy, critical pedagogy, ecopedagogy, ubuntugogy, creative pedagogy, peeragogy, hip-hop critical pedagogy and public pedagogy. The present day teaching faculty needs to be familiarized and equipped to employ these neo-advanced teaching techniques, appropriately with comfort, to make their students or pupils better employable.
Indeed, enabling of the students to optimally learn and to prepare them for the forthcoming competitive era, teaching approaches need to be customized to equip the students with the knowledge, skills and competencies needed to thrive in such a hypercompetitive economy. Modern day teachers and educators need to embrace ever newer methodologies that are more relevant to the exigencies of today's learning (Educators technology.com 12 Nov 24, 2013). Andragogical and heutagogical approaches, along with other newer evolving gogies need to complement the conventional pedagogical approaches. India has a vast number of 32.5 crore students enrolled in 13.96 lakh schools, almost equal to the total US population, and 3.5 crore students, almost equal to  the total Canadian population, enrolled with 830 universities and 45000 colleges. But, such vast mass of our students fare very badly, when compared internationally. Our school going students have stood second from bottom, in a comparative evaluation made under the ‘Programme for International Students Assessment’ (PISA), being conducted among the 15-year old school students of 73 countries. Regarding the employability- percentage of students, graduating from universities, various agencies in the country put it at 07 to 45 percent for students of different streams. To better this score at a faster pace, we have to enrich and complement our lecture and discussion dominated pedagogy, often leading to monotony in learning need to be broad based by three of the
major "gogies" (pedagogy andragogy and heutagogy), supported by the seven similar gogies like (i) critical pedagogy, (ii) ecopedagogy, (iii) ubuntugogy, (iv)creative pedagogy (v) peeragogy, (vi) hip-hop critical pedagogy and (vii) public pedagogy.
The present paper instead of explaining all the ten "gogies", which have a spread of a full separate monograph, would focus upon some of the easily employable and hyper-effective techniques. However, it would yet not be out of context to explain the three premier 'gogies' (pedagogy, andragogy and heutagogy) to facilitate better understanding of the conduct of such approaches employed under the guise of the three gogies.    

The Pedagogical model of instruction was originally developed in the monastic schools of Europe in the middle Ages. Pedagogy is derived from the Greek word “Paed’’ or ‘’Pedo” or ‘’Ped’’ meaning child, plus “agogos” meaning leading. As such, young boys were received into the monasteries and taught by monks according to a system of structured instruction that required these children to be obedient, faithful and efficient servers for the church (Knowles 1984). Hence,  now in cosmopolitan secular culture as well pedagogy has been defined as the art and science of teaching children. It is based on the assumption that learners need to know, what the teacher teaches them (Hiemstra & Sirco 1990). The result is a teaching and learning situation that actively promotes dependency on the instructor (Knowles: 1984). But, unlike children, the adults with their maturity, and experience need to be educates with andragogical approaches and also through self directed (heutagogical) approaches to the problem solving, depict least interest and involvement in the pedagogical approach of instruction, suited more to teach children, resulting into poor compatibility of the learners to cope with the ever newer real life problems and challenges, emerging out of the rapidly changing scenario. Androgogy
Andragogy and its Underlying Assumptions
         The growth and development of andragogy as an alternative model of instruction has helped to remedy this situation and improve the teaching of adults (Hiemstra & Sisco: 1990). According to Julie et. al, andragogy is the art and science of helping adults learn. Malcolm Knowles (1978, 1990) while introducing the concept of adult learning for the first time has argued that adulthood can be said to have arrived, when people behave in adult ways and adopt independent approach in viewing things, solving problems and exploring ways to solve the same. By this criteria a student even at degree level itself, be treated adult and needs to be educated with andragogical approach. Burns (1995, P. 233) also opines the same by saying that, at adulthood people are self directing. Hence, the andragogical approach in management education has to be more and more student centered, experience based, problem oriented and collaborative to facilitate learning instead of merely transmitting the theoretical concepts of textbooks through lectures, audio visual techniques and other programmed instructional pedagogy. According to Knowles (1978, 1990) adult learning is special in a number of ways and is based upon the following assumptions.

·    Adult learners bring a great deal of experience to the learning environment. Educators can use this as a resource.
·    Adults expect to have a high degree of influence on what they are to be educated for, and how they are to be educated.
·    The active participation of learners should be encouraged in designing and implementing educational programs.
·    Adults need to be enabled to see applications for new learning.
·   Adult learners expect to have a high degree of influence on how learning will be evaluated.
·   Adults expect their responses to be acted upon when asked for feedback on the progress of the program.
Distinctive Attributes 
Based on the above assumptions of adult learning, the pedagogical approach of transmitting knowledge in management education can be distinguished from the andragogy on following four counts:
(i)    Teacher Learner Roles
(ii)     Learning Resources and Techniques
(iii)   Motive
(iv)   Focus

Theories of adult Learning
Andragogical approach in learning helps to overcome many of the limitations encountered by lecture and audio-visual presentation based classroom teaching. Over dependence on this latter approach results in poor learning. Classroom learning is often dubbed as inefficient method of education. According to Stewart (2001: p 184) half the people in class often secretly work on their “real” jobs; half are so relieved not to be doing their real jobs, they have turned their minds entirely off. Half already know, half the stuff being taught. Half will never need to know more than half of it. Hence andragogical approach draws its strength from the following major theories of adult learning:
1.         Action Learning
2.         Experiential Learning
3.         Project Based Learning
4.         Self Directed Learning
Their relevance can be better understood from Table 2, an abridged form of the table created by Mandy McEntyre and Jenn Pahl(2006).
Complementarity of Pedagogy  Andragogy and Heutagogy :
Andragogy is though, a distinctive model for educating adult students of business studies, but need not be seen as dichotomous with pedagogical approach. Rather, the two approaches (Pedagogy and andragogy) are to be seen as two ends of a spectrum to be used in proper blend (Knowles: 1980). The pedagogical and andragogical techniques that can be appropriately blended for optimum learning along with heutagogy. They are not mutually exclusive, but complementary to enhance reciprocal efficacy. The techniques of teaching falling under the three gogies can be enumerated as under:

Lecture Method
Vestibule School
Chapter Reviews
Case study
Discussions
Role Play
Group Discussion (GD) Method
Simulations and Mind Games
Fish Bowl Exercise (A superior variant of GD)
In basket simulation
Special Readings
Business/Management Games
Slides or Power Point Presentation
Project Based Learning
Audio Recordings
Facilitating Experiential Learning
Video Recordings
Syndicate Method
Films on Television or LCDs
E-Teaching Learning
Presentations
Outward Bound Learning
Participatory Teaching
Sensitivity Method
Conference
Problem Based Learning

   Heutagogy:
Heutagogy is basically a learner centric technique and is focused on 'self determined learning'. Thus, where as the andragogy grew out of the term pedagogy, heutagogy was created as an offshoot of andragogy.  We see that in Hase and Kenyon’s 2001 article entitled, “From Andragogy to Heutagogy.” Heutagogy maintains the andragogical learner-centered emphasis, but takes it a step further by also highlighting the importance of develop the skills necessary to learn on one’s own. As such, heutagogy is often described as the study of self-determined or self-directed learning.  It is not just about learning content, but also learning how to learn.  It is an especially relevant approach in the digital age, given the vast amount of content and resources available to anyone with a device and Internet access.  Given so much information, how can people learn to leverage these resources to engage in lifelong learning?  Where pedagogy and andragogy continue to reflect to some degree upon the role of the teacher, heutagogy moves beyond this, focusing exclusively on the learner and this notion of self-directed learning. As explained by Hase and Kenyon, “the learner decides what and how to learn.”[Bernard Bull: 2013 April 23]
Indian universities and colleges need to assimilate and adopt appropriate andragogical, heutagogical and other suitable approaches, along with the conventional pedagogical approaches to improve transmission of knowledge as well as to upgrade skills and capabilities to overcome the problem of poor employability of Indian graduates. A recent study of Aspiring Minds (a New Delhi based employment solutions company) published in India Today in Education, dated July 13, 2016, alleges that only 7% of India’s engineering graduates are employable and another study of ASSOCHAM published on July 11, 2016 alleges that 93% of country’s MBA graduates are not employable. The figures of employability have come down in last 3-5 years. Same is true with accounting professionals and other graduates. A pedagogical advancement and optimization (including that of the andragogical and heutagogical as well other seven gogies) becomes indispensable to enhance learning and improve student capabilities. So, the modern guru have to equip themselves with the various denova and emerging gogies of teaching to better engage and turnout well employable alumini. On top of all a host pedagogies have also evolved for deep ingraining of ethics and values in the conduct and behavior of the learners. Modern gurus have to master such pedagogies as well.  












References:
Burns, R. 1995 The adult learner at work Business and Professional Publishing, Sydney
Burns, S. 1995 ‘Rapid changes require enhancement of adult learning’ HRMonthly June, pp 16-17.
Hiemstra, R., & Sisco, B. (1990). Individualizing instruction. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Knowles, M.S. (1968). Androgogy, not pedagogy! Adult Leadership, 16, 350-352, 386.
Knowles, M.S. (1975). Self-directed learning. New York: Association Press.
Knowles, M.S. (1980). The modern practice of adult education (revised and updated). Chicago: Association Press (originally published in 1970).
Knowles, M. (1984). The adult learner: A neglected species. Houston: Gulf Publishing.
Knowles, M.S.(1986). Using learning contracts. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Knowles, M., & Asspcoates/ (1984). Andragogy in Action. Applying modern principles of adult education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Knowles, M.(2002). Lifelong learning: A Dream. Creating the future: Perspective on Educational Change, v. January. October 10, 2003.
Terry Heick, Androgogy v/s heutagogoy. Png (PNG Image, 1430*1100 pixels)- Scale…..http://3.bp.blogpost.com/-MOeldagg.CA/UPKeQRSLLgI/AAAAA..
Stewart Hase and chris Kenyon (2001), www.pry.gla.ac.uk/~steve/pr/Heutagogy.html
Mandy McEntyre and Jenn Pahl(2006), Learning Theories Related to Adult Learning. http//mataconine.mate.net…./Learning_Theories_Related_to_Adult_Learning.docx?
Stewart, T.(2201). Mystified by training? Here are some clues. Fortune, v. 143,p.184.
Stewart, D.W.(1986a) Adult learning in America: Eduard lindeman and his agenda for lifelong learning. Malabar, FL: Krieger Publishing.
Stewart, D.H. (1986b). Prespectives. Lifelong Learning: An Omnibus of Practice and Research, 9(5), 2.
The Difference Between Pedagogy, Andragogy, And Heutagogy, http:/www.teachthought.com/pedagogy/a-primer-in-heutagogy-and-s…

Plantation and Ecological Balance

ikS/kkjksi.k o gekjk ikfjfLFkdh ra= Published in shaikshik manthan       ns'k esa lHkh f'k{k.k laLFkk,a izfro"kZ O;kid...